Author Topic: Lee vs. Grant  (Read 478 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jessica

  • Legionary
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Lee vs. Grant
« on: April 29, 2012, 08:57:55 AM »
Who was the better leader?
« Last Edit: April 29, 2012, 09:13:22 AM by Jessica »
A good historian can view the world through the eyes of the people who lived it.

Offline DonaldBaker

  • Global Moderator
  • Senator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • It be like all that...
Re: Lee vs. Grant
« Reply #1 on: April 30, 2012, 12:32:19 PM »
Who was the better leader?

There is no real way to qualify this and do each man justice.  They both were great leaders and utilized what they had to the most potential.  Grant had more resources at his disposal so his margin for error was greater.  Lee ultimately lost, but he new he was fighting a losing battle anyway, yet he managed to outmaneuver the Union Army for four years an accomplishment to say the least.  Now had you asked who the better man was, well that would have been easier.


Offline Notch

  • Centurion
  • ***
  • Posts: 287
Re: Lee vs. Grant
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2012, 12:33:36 PM »
That's like Pepsi or Coke... it's all in who you ask and tastes.

What I always wondered is what would have happened had their roles been reversed? Lee commanding the Union forces and Grant the southern? Would the outcome have been the same?
If the people raise a great howl against my barbarity and cruelty, I will answer that war is war, and not popularity seeking. - William Tecumseh Sherman
I know no way of judging the future but by the past - Patrick Henry

Offline Daniel

  • Centurion
  • ***
  • Posts: 180
Re: Lee vs. Grant
« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2012, 05:34:16 PM »
What I always wondered is what would have happened had their roles been reversed? Lee commanding the Union forces and Grant the southern? Would the outcome have been the same?
Yes.