• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

WCF

History, politics, and culture articles and forum discussions.

You are here: Home / Topics / Are the Comparisons between Vietnam and Iraq fair?

- By

Are the Comparisons between Vietnam and Iraq fair?

Home › Forums › Recent American History › Are the Comparisons between Vietnam and Iraq fair?

  • This topic has 10 voices and 24 replies.
Viewing 11 posts - 16 through 26 (of 26 total)
← 1 2
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 16, 2006 at 12:49 am #4525 Reply
    skiguy
    Moderator

    I think some comparisons are fair.  Both are opposed by the same people.  It was those who opposed the Viet Nam war who started the opposition to this war.  IMHO.

    October 13, 2006 at 4:34 pm #4526 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    I think a new question can be asked – do the people who oppose these wars have a legitimate message or not?  In other words, are they merely opposing war for the sake of opposing it, or do you think they are opposing the kind of war? 

    October 13, 2006 at 9:06 pm #4527 Reply
    skiguy
    Moderator

    Good questions, Phid.  I really have no idea how to answer other than with my own opinion.  I think some people just can't handle war.  They can't handle the horrors and ugliness of it.  Also, with the GWOT, I think a lot of people just have an “I quit” attitude.  I strongly feel the media is not helping any because they emphasize the negative. I've yet to figure out why they do that and why they can't be more encouraging.  So another question.  Why does the media emphasize and harp on the negative so much during war time nowadays?  (Quite the opposite during WWII I would imagine)  Is it society's fault?  Or do they actually have an agenda?

    October 13, 2006 at 9:56 pm #4528 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    Based on what I have seen, it is based on an agenda.  On one of my homepages I see the AP news headlines, and I regularly see headlines which talk about U.S. troops dying or how violence is somehow really bad.  What I think is that the same people who oppose conservative social and financial policies have joined the bandwagon to harp against the U.S. in Iraq.  I don't think that this is the case with all the opposition, but some of it.  I think back to when Clinton bombed a factory in Somalia back in 1998 at the height of the Lewinsky problem, and I really only remember hearing a little bit of condemnation of that (by the Beastie Boys at a music awards ceremony).  One might have thought there would be more condemnation of such a unilateral act back then by the left.So getting to the point of what I'm saying, perhaps it's not entirely the same people who opposed Vietnam that also oppose Iraq today.  I don't think that politics were quite as bitterly divided between right and left as they are nowadays.  One thing that I found interesting – growing up I'd hear stories or watch movies about Vietnam, and it seemed like a big horror story.  But about a year ago I watched a show on the history channel where it discussed actual battles and engagements.  The U.S. soldiers actually did a superior job at fighting in terms of loss of life.  This was not quite the story that I thought I knew.

    October 15, 2006 at 11:14 pm #4529 Reply
    Stumpfoot
    Participant

      The U.S. soldiers actually did a superior job at fighting in terms of loss of life.  This was not quite the story that I thought I knew.

    If I remember my numbers correctly it was something like 55,000 u.s. and 2 million vienameses/chinese. I will have to look that up but that is what I seem to remember, it was very lopsided.

    October 16, 2006 at 2:59 am #4530 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    Are you saying those are numbers of people killed?

    October 16, 2006 at 3:24 am #4531 Reply
    Stumpfoot
    Participant

    I believe so. I know sometimes they include all casulties in battles and sometimes not. I will have to check.

    October 20, 2006 at 7:04 pm #4532 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    I was watching Fox News last night and they raised comparisons to the political end of Vietnam and Iraq.  They discussed whether a Democratic victory this Fall would usher in a “Withdraw Now” push as what evidently happened in the 1970s.  It was argued that this would not happen, but that there would be a possibility that a Democrat Congress would start tying the setting of specific withdrawal or other action dates by the President into other bills (such as spending bills?).  Based on this it seems that the anti-war crowd was more vocal and/or powerful during the 1970s if they were demanding immediate withdrawal.     

    October 20, 2006 at 9:54 pm #4533 Reply
    Stumpfoot
    Participant

    By then though hadnt they been there 12 or 15 years? A lot longer then Iraq.

    November 22, 2006 at 5:20 pm #4534 Reply
    rhino56
    Participant

    Good point.                                                                                                                                                                                                 I think this is the case  no matter who is occupying who. Wouldn't we be resentful if we were occupied by a foreign nation?

    Myself personally if a ruler like Saddam Hussein was our dictator i would have been happy to been invaded by those trying to free me given who i am and the knowledge i have today. If i were raised within that dictatorship being brainwashed with the propaganda i may also feel differently.

    November 22, 2006 at 8:41 pm #4535 Reply
    Stumpfoot
    Participant

    Myself personally if a ruler like Saddam Hussein was our dictator i would have been happy to been invaded by those trying to free me given who i am and the knowledge i have today. If i were raised within that dictatorship being brainwashed with the propaganda i may also feel differently.

    Sometimes people have a hard time (or even forget) to put themselves in other peoples shoes before they judge.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 11 posts - 16 through 26 (of 26 total)
← 1 2
Reply To: Reply #4519 in Are the Comparisons between Vietnam and Iraq fair?
Your information:




Primary Sidebar

Login

Log In
Register Lost Password

Blog Categories

Search blog articles

Before Footer

  • Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?

    Julian the Apostate stands as an enigmatic figure among Roman emperors, ascending to power in 361 AD …

    Read More

    Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?
  • The Babylonian Bride

    Marriage customs in Ancient Babylon Ancient Babylonia was a society, which, although it did not …

    Read More

    The Babylonian Bride
  • The fall of Athens

    In 407 B.C. and again in 405 B.C.. the Spartans in alliance with their old enemies, the Persians, …

    Read More

    The fall of Athens

Footer

Posts by topic

2016 Election Alexander Hamilton American Revolution archaeology Aristotle Ben Franklin Black Americans Charles Dickens Christianity Christmas Constantine Custer's Last Stand Egypt email engineering England forum security Founding Fathers France future history George Washington Germany Greece hacker Hitler Industrial Revolution Ireland James Madison Jewish medieval military history Paleolithic philosophy pilgrimage Rome Russia SEO Slavery Socrates spammer technology Trump World War I World War II Year In Review

Recent Topics

  • Midsummer Night: June 25th
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?
  • Release of the JFK Files
  • What was the greatest military advancement of all time?

RSS Ancient News

Recent Forum Replies

  • Going to feature old posts
  • What’s new?
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Testing out a new feature

Copyright © 2025 · Contact

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.