- This topic has 9 voices and 57 replies.
-
Posts
-
If I have a vote, and I am not sure if I do, I would have to say ban him.
Make that 2 votes
…make that 3. HF makes me use my Imitrex (for migraines) more often than I should… :-
JMO, shouldn't this thread be deleted?I don't think it looks good, especially with it being in the announcements section.Again, JMO. Do not put me in jail as a dissenter.
Alright, I'll move it to Quarantine. Over the last few days he had made many posts like that but I would delete them almost immediately, except for this particular message. I don't know what it refers to.
Man, I believe we're dealing with a toddler (HF) here by having to follow after him and “police” his posts yet I feel sort of sorry for him. (must be that mothering-tendency in me :-[)
Just ban him Phid. He's not going to change, and he isn't going to add anything to WCF. I know it's hard to “pull the lever” on him, but he needs to be put out of his misery here. 🙂
Hate to be a technotard… but when he's out of the dogbox won't he be able to read this thread?
Ha, no – I removed his ability to see the Roman Senate Chambers area, so he can't read this thread. Anyway he can still view the posts on this forum but he just can't post messages himself. I told him it was a “cooling off” period.
The Roman Senate ChambersThis is where distinguished members with the rank of Legionary or higher may discuss off-topic matters of the day without fear (15 post minimum) Guess I need to pay more attention ::)… duh! Thanks for looking out for the board… it's too good a pl(a)ce to see messed up.Cheers to all,Wally
Haven't been around for a while..laptop took a dump…but I see the village idiot still posts here…not at NJO, thank God.You people are saints, IMHO
I know I have not been a prolific poster of late, (I am still settling in and dont have a reliable internet connection yet) but I still think is a distraction and his rambling posts detract from the overall high quality of the posts on this forum. He strikes me as a drunken navel gazer who just likes to poke fingers in other peoples eyes. I still think he should be banned, his occasional flashes of coherence do not cancel out his many obtuse and sometimes downright insulting other utterances. Just two cents more from me.
Joy, joy. I didn't realize he was back until I read some of his posts. Poor guy, he just can't contain himself.
When he came back after his last ban I thought he was trying hard to be respectful and to keep his posts on topic. I didn't realize this before but I had restricted him so he couldn't edit his own posts, so that may have been why he was doing multiple replies instead of fixing what he had already written.I'll PM him and explain the situation, and if he doesn't fix himself I'll ban him for good, ok? I don't think he's here to discuss history anyway. If only he had a general discussion/firearms forum to post on, that would be perfect for him. Wait a second…… ;D
I don't think he's here to discuss history anyway.
You can say that again, Most times I cannot follow what point he is trying to make, if any.
When he came back after his last ban I thought he was trying hard to be respectful and to keep his posts on topic. I didn't realize this before but I had restricted him so he couldn't edit his own posts, so that may have been why he was doing multiple replies instead of fixing what he had already written.I'll PM him and explain the situation, and if he doesn't fix himself I'll ban him for good, ok? I don't think he's here to discuss history anyway. If only he had a general discussion/firearms forum to post on, that would be perfect for him. Wait a second…… ;D
Don't EVEN THINK about going there ;D
