• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

WCF

History, politics, and culture articles and forum discussions.

You are here: Home / Topics / The Battle for Rome

- By

The Battle for Rome

Home › Forums › Ancient Civilizations › The Battle for Rome

  • This topic has 4 voices and 6 replies.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 14, 2006 at 2:06 am #399 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    I saw a great show last night on the History Channel called The Battle for Rome.  Decent special effects, good acting, great sets, and much more than the 10 or so extras you might see in a “battle” sequence in other historical event depictions.So anyway, the show gave various episodes in the history of ancient Rome.  One of these was Vespasian's conquest of Rome and his subsequent sending of his son, Titus, to Jerusalem.  It occurred to me that the Romans replaced skill and strategy with brute force.  They surrounded Jerusalem and could not get past her walls.  The walls were simply too high, too deep, and too thick.  The Romans also could not starve the Jews out because food was still being sent in somehow.  So what does Titus do?  He builds a 4-mile wall around Rome to make sure nothing gets in (or out)!  A little over-the-top, don't you think?  Whereas the Jews were ingenious when they dug a tunnel under their own wall to burn the Roman siege tower, the Romans used predictable warfare techniques to defeat the Jews.  And of course, as well all know the Romans sacked Jerusalem and the temple.  I didn't know how the Romans had acted during the siege, but now that I know I think I've lost a little respect for them.  I thought they would have used more intelligence in their siege.

    November 14, 2006 at 2:45 am #7048 Reply
    Stumpfoot
    Participant

    Sounds like a good one, I will have to see if they are going to air it again.

    November 22, 2006 at 4:17 am #7049 Reply
    rhino56
    Participant

    The rise and fall of Rome certainly had everything to do with its leaders and military leaders. They assumed that they were invincible, which turned out to be a deadly assumption.

    November 22, 2006 at 5:59 am #7050 Reply
    DonaldBaker
    Participant

    The rise and fall of Rome certainly had everything to do with its leaders and military leaders. They assumed that they were invincible, which turned out to be a deadly assumption.

    Well in terms of their external enemies, the Romans were pretty much invincible.  It's when they turned on themselves and stagnated culturally, the barbarian hordes overwhelmed them.  The same process occurred in the Eastern Empire and the Turks chopped away at them.

    November 22, 2006 at 6:24 am #7051 Reply
    Stumpfoot
    Participant

    Well in terms of their external enemies, the Romans were pretty much invincible.  It's when they turned on themselves and stagnated culturally, the barbarian hordes overwhelmed them.  The same process occurred in the Eastern Empire and the Turks chopped away at them.

    Good post Donnie. Do you think thats a common theme in the decline of most empires?

    November 22, 2006 at 5:00 pm #7052 Reply
    DonaldBaker
    Participant

    Good post Donnie. Do you think thats a common theme in the decline of most empires?

    Absolutely.  Not much to do with one's empire after all has been conquered but to begin quarreling among themselves and get fat and lazy……or discover a wonderful new religion like Christianity that changes the entire course of the empire. 😉

    November 22, 2006 at 5:42 pm #7053 Reply
    rhino56
    Participant

    I would agree that not only is it a common theme in civilizations on a large scale but also right down to a small scale of a marriage.

    November 22, 2006 at 8:40 pm #7054 Reply
    Stumpfoot
    Participant

    Divide and conquer! not only do we have enemies that do it, but we can do it to ourselves sometimes without even realizing it.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
Reply To: Reply #7049 in The Battle for Rome
Your information:




Primary Sidebar

Login

Log In
Register Lost Password

Blog Categories

Search blog articles

Before Footer

  • Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?

    Julian the Apostate stands as an enigmatic figure among Roman emperors, ascending to power in 361 AD …

    Read More

    Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?
  • The Babylonian Bride

    Marriage customs in Ancient Babylon Ancient Babylonia was a society, which, although it did not …

    Read More

    The Babylonian Bride
  • The fall of Athens

    In 407 B.C. and again in 405 B.C.. the Spartans in alliance with their old enemies, the Persians, …

    Read More

    The fall of Athens

Footer

Posts by topic

2016 Election Alexander Hamilton American Revolution archaeology Aristotle Ben Franklin Black Americans Charles Dickens Christianity Christmas Constantine Custer's Last Stand Egypt email engineering England forum security Founding Fathers France future history George Washington Germany Greece hacker Hitler Industrial Revolution Ireland James Madison Jewish medieval military history Paleolithic philosophy pilgrimage Rome Russia SEO Slavery Socrates spammer technology Trump World War I World War II Year In Review

Recent Topics

  • Midsummer Night: June 25th
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?
  • Release of the JFK Files
  • What was the greatest military advancement of all time?

RSS Ancient News

Recent Forum Replies

  • Going to feature old posts
  • What’s new?
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Testing out a new feature

Copyright © 2025 · Contact

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.