• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

WCF

History, politics, and culture articles and forum discussions.

You are here: Home

mikee

  • Profile
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
1 2 →
  • Author
    Posts
  • July 2, 2010 at 7:39 pm in reply to: Elizabeth I and the snake #19255
    mikee
    Participant

    I wonder if any scholars might give an opinion on this fair maideand the slithery chappie who seems to be eating some titbit or other.Where, might this image be found? is, methinks a reasonable quessssssssssstion'regardsss  ss    s

    July 2, 2010 at 2:27 pm in reply to: The beehives of Rosslyn Chapel #19976
    mikee
    Participant

    no one came back? bzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    July 2, 2010 at 2:27 pm in reply to: Elizabeth I and the snake #19254
    mikee
    Participant

    hiwhat do mainstream scholars know? they've spent the past two hundred years with their heads in the wrong place.The facts are these: as far as I am aware there is not one scholar, with one femtometer of knowledge, about shakespeare.All is ifs and buts (mostly the latter).Name one article that states in absolute terms what the Sonnets are all about. Betcha can't.Try and convince a Jehova's W that Pythagoreans were correct. The same thing when talking to scholars.It's no surprise then to see that the plays marked as shakespeare don't think much of them.Inkpots is a word which comes to mind whenever shakespearean shcolar are mentioned.regardsssss

    July 1, 2010 at 10:45 am in reply to: Elizabeth I and the snake #19252
    mikee
    Participant

    hi allyesssss i have it turned fully on now thanksssssssss kindly.Sssssssssssssssssarcasssssssssssssssstic isssssssssssssssss sssssssssssssssssomething i rarely usssssssssssssssssewithout sssssssssssssssssssssstopping to thinkAssssssssss regardssssssssssss LissssssssssssssseeeDo you know the name of the persssssssssson was chief mourner at her funeral?Sssssssssssssssave you sssssssssssssssearching….. her name wasssssssssssssss:Helen  Snakenborg.the fasssssssssssssse which launched a thousssssssssssssssssand sssssssssssssssssssssshipssssssssssss  ?or wassssssssssssssss that mirrorsssssssssssssssssssssss ?  Ask Jasssssssssssssssson.regardssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss< VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV <  ssss

    June 29, 2010 at 2:38 pm in reply to: Where does this old map represent? #21614
    mikee
    Participant

    thanks for reply phidiI see a dogs face, its asleep.If its turned over I see a man's head.I post it for you.I think — anyone else?thanks again

    June 29, 2010 at 4:42 am in reply to: Elizabeth I and the snake #19250
    mikee
    Participant

    what was lizzy into? can't you read?

    June 28, 2010 at 6:29 pm in reply to: Elizabeth I and the snake #19248
    mikee
    Participant

    Hiits all about Ouroboros. Q Lizzy, Bacon Dee and a host of others were real Templars, not the rubbish.regards

    June 28, 2010 at 2:58 pm in reply to: Elizabeth I and the snake #19246
    mikee
    Participant

    Just remembered this:http://www.marileecody.com/gloriana/rainbowlarger.jpgzoom in to her right arm, and also look very very carefully at her cloak. There's alot more than eyes and ears there, I can tell you!regards

    June 27, 2010 at 4:11 pm in reply to: Elizabeth I and the snake #19245
    mikee
    Participant

    darn nusiance this. Only one uploadedtry reducing res and post again

    June 27, 2010 at 4:07 pm in reply to: Elizabeth I and the snake #19244
    mikee
    Participant

    That last upload failed on two images. I used png this time jpghope it worksregards

    June 27, 2010 at 4:02 pm in reply to: Elizabeth I and the snake #19243
    mikee
    Participant

    Here's the answer:hand, serpent, letter O symbolised by neck pendant (probably st george over dragon, because the serpent in Eden had legs and wings) 4 (pearls) and last of all the Greek small Omega, whichrepresents the uniquely English letter W.All these go to make this number (according to the Elizabethan alphabet:  hand 26  +      s      o      d    w  18 + 14 + 4 + 21 = 83The number 26 is the sum of H + A +N + D as alphabet place-values. The reason why only HAND is done this way,and not, say, PEARL, is due to something rather special about the number 26 and the hand. It must be sufficient to asy that all writing was done by the hand, and there are ** now ** 26 letters in the alphabet.Read Shake-speares Sonnet 83:I neuer saw that you did painting need,And therefore to your faire no painting set,I found (or thought I found) you did exceed,  +++++ see note belowThe barren tender of a Poets debt:And therefore haue I slept in your report,That you your selfe being extant well might show,How farre a moderne quill doth come to short,Speaking of worth, what worth in you doth grow,This silence for my sinne you did impute,Which shall be most my glory being dombe,For I impaire not beautie being mute,  When others would giue life, and bring a tombe.There liues more life in one of your faire eyes,      ******* see my ref to Lizzies dress with loads of eyes on it.Then both your Poets can in praise deuise.It can be shown that hand  =  26    and 2 + 6 = 8 and 8 = 1 + 7  now call that result 17 which is the letter R and add to  s o d a thus creating SWORDNow pronounce it;  Essssss  word  and hear Elissssabethsss ssserpenssss.Now take the number of the sonnet: 83 and add making 11now go to the 11th word in the sonnet which is TOnow do to that word what has been done above, thus creating the number 33that is the number of many things, not least the name BACON, and EYE.I think there is another portrait of Elissabeth in a dress with many eyes on it.Now count up the sonnet  (like a snake) to the 11th word YOURand find its number also. It is 74.So we have in Shakespeares Sonnet 11, in the 11th word down, the number 33 which is BACON.The 11th word upwards has the number 74, which is the same as for the name WILLIAM.Go to the end of the original Sonnets, and there begins a 47 verse poem called 'A lover's Complaint,'Only in this poem is the name William Shakespeare used. In the Sonnets the name is Shake-speares, and no William is used, even on the front title page.On the first page of A lovers Complaint, is printed  in capitals: WILLIAM SNAKESPEARE.There is a picture in an old book of Sir Francis Bacon cutting a snake in two.Can you put two and two together?I have posted three pics. I want to know what the little pic is of.++++++ Note line 3>>>>> I found (or thought I found) you did exceed,contains the 18th word in the sonnet. S was 18th in the old abc. But they needed more space to write a little Greek wordand here's what the did: They wrote I found (where found is the 18th word)  and intended that the letters I F and D be noted,Then they added a bracket (as an excuse to write the thing doubled) and wrote the same thing again, onlythis time they use (I thought) meaning we, the readers, should think. And thus we can take a second shotat the phrase 'I found' and extract another two letters I and F. We don't take another 4, this is flagged by the four pearls around Q Lizzies neck.We have now got five letters: I F D and IF.  It should be noted how many digits a hand has: we now form the letters to make FIDI  FThe Greek word? In English fidi, meaning snake.The last FThe first letter of Francis Bacon.regards

    June 27, 2010 at 2:59 pm in reply to: The beehives of Rosslyn Chapel #19975
    mikee
    Participant

    Bees were a symbol used by certain groups of individuals. Napolian Bonaparte had them painted in one of his portraits.The Bee stood for M.Ask a Mason and he won't know. It's like the G – no idea. Its like the bare breast and knee – all is like chimpanzees copy but not know.The M was considered to be very special.regards

    June 27, 2010 at 2:49 pm in reply to: A map of Rome from 1588 #21353
    mikee
    Participant

    Hi PhidiInteresting stuff that. Have you done anything else on those lines?I can't believe it! Just posted an old map myself in  The Age of Reason forum.Talk about coincidence.regards

    June 27, 2010 at 2:46 pm in reply to: The Bones of Caravaggio #21531
    mikee
    Participant

    It might be of interest to you to know that I have just completed some research of early Italian texts, and I am trying to identify a map which I have posted today in thus forumPlease let me know if you have any idea where it's supposed to be.regards

    June 27, 2010 at 10:03 am in reply to: Oak Island: Is any one looking into the mysterious well? #21595
    mikee
    Participant

    Hi Phidippides thanks for replyNo hoax — more like a place to focus attention and point to the correct place.Bacon & Co (invludind Q Eliz and King J I) engineered many things textual, one such text was the King James 1611 bible. The place he most played with is the book of Psalms. But he worked with the Book of Job, and 'Shakespeare's' stuff, in particular the Sonnets.Consideer Psalms:7:15 He made a pit, and digged it, and is fallen into the ditch whichhe made.7:16 His mischief shall return upon his own head, and his violentdealing shall come down upon his own pate.And a deciphering from Sonnet 2 (B for Bacon):Wil being askt,digge deep  Where all the treasure  lies,deepe sunkensum my count,Proouing his beautie by succession thine.  new And also something from the book of Job: 6:27 Yea, ye overwhelm the fatherless, and ye dig a pit for your friend.F (for Francis) is 6 in the abc.Then we must remember a certain pit or hole in Stratford upon Avon, (in fact a pair, side by side) the more famous hole covered by a stone slab, without a name on it. But there are plenty of other words engraved there, the first 2 (B for Bacon) beinf 'GOOD FREND'.Notice the way they spelled friend? No I, reads F  END (F for Francis) And under those words:  TO DIGGE eyc etc No fraud my friend… simply not putting all the eggs in one basket. Lay the bait as far as possible for security.Then there's less chance of losing you treasure.That name Phidippides… did you know there's a snake in it?regards

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
1 2 →
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 47
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Login

Log In
Register Lost Password

Blog Categories

Search blog articles

Before Footer

  • Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?

    Julian the Apostate stands as an enigmatic figure among Roman emperors, ascending to power in 361 AD …

    Read More

    Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?
  • The Babylonian Bride

    Marriage customs in Ancient Babylon Ancient Babylonia was a society, which, although it did not …

    Read More

    The Babylonian Bride
  • The fall of Athens

    In 407 B.C. and again in 405 B.C.. the Spartans in alliance with their old enemies, the Persians, …

    Read More

    The fall of Athens

Footer

Posts by topic

2016 Election Alexander Hamilton American Revolution archaeology Aristotle Ben Franklin Black Americans Charles Dickens Christianity Christmas Constantine Custer's Last Stand Egypt email engineering England forum security Founding Fathers France future history George Washington Germany Greece hacker Hitler Industrial Revolution Ireland James Madison Jewish medieval military history Paleolithic philosophy pilgrimage Rome Russia SEO Slavery Socrates spammer technology Trump World War I World War II Year In Review

Recent Topics

  • Midsummer Night: June 25th
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?
  • Release of the JFK Files
  • What was the greatest military advancement of all time?

RSS Ancient News

Recent Forum Replies

  • Going to feature old posts
  • What’s new?
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Testing out a new feature

Copyright © 2025 · Contact