• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

WCF

History, politics, and culture articles and forum discussions.

You are here: Home / Topics / Anti-religion and the French Revolution

- By

Anti-religion and the French Revolution

Home › Forums › Early Modern Europe › Anti-religion and the French Revolution

  • This topic has 6 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 4 months ago by Phidippides.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 14, 2009 at 7:27 pm #1548 Reply
    scout1067
    Participant

    This is something that has come up in a class I am taking.  Before the Directory, how important were the anti-religious tendencies of the Jacobins to their program?  I would argue that the secular portion of the Jacobin agenda was central to their identity.  The Jacobins went to extraordinary measures to secularize France.  They even went so far as to write a new calendar, enforce burials in unconsecrated ground, and replace religious festivals with secular ones.  It is noteworthy that one of the first things Napoleon did when he came to power is sign the Concordat.  The Directory which immediately succeeded the Terror reinstated the Gregorian calendar and eliminated the most blatant anti-religious laws in order to regain calm in the countryside.I have been debating with some other students who claim that secularization was simply a way for the Jacobins to solidify their power.  I say otherwise.

    April 15, 2009 at 1:55 am #15249 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    I can see how quashing power of rivals can be a way of solidifying one's own power, but the Jacobins went well beyond this during/after the French Revolution.  They were, to be sure, extremists.  Their extreme actions were simply manifestations of their extreme ideology.  I wonder if your classmates also think that Robespierre's Cult of the Supreme Being ceremony was simply an extension of political solidification.

    April 15, 2009 at 4:31 am #15250 Reply
    scout1067
    Participant

    Their argument is along the lines of revolutionary thought being part of the natural progression of human thought.  I claim that it was more the logical extreme of Enlightenment thought.  Look at some of the writings of Elnlightenment thinkers like Voltaire, Diderot, Payne, etc.  Voltaire is notable for his diatribes against religion.

    April 15, 2009 at 4:43 am #15251 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    I don't understand what the “natural progression of human thought” is supposed to be.  Mob rule?  Totalitarianism?  These did spring out of the Revolution, and so I would challenge anyone who claimed some way of thinking came about through “natural progression”, if there is such a thing.I am not entirely certain that anti-religious fervor of the Revolution was precisely the same as the anti-religious feelings expressed by thinkers like Voltaire or Diderot.  It seems to me that the mob was concerned with an upheaval of religion because of its association with the entrenched social order (including the monarchy), whereas the Enlightenment thinkers were chiefly anti-religious because of their philosophical denial of divine revelation and all that it entailed.  That said, I'm sure there was crossover and that both the Enlightenment thinkers and the mob shared some common tenets.

    April 17, 2009 at 2:23 pm #15252 Reply
    scout1067
    Participant

    To listen to my classmates, dialectic socialism and the doctrine of class struggle is the pinnacle of man's political development and evil capitalists are oppressing the working class.  They sound like a bunch Marxist-Leninists.  One even seriously talked about the “dictatorship of the proletariat” as a good thing, he says the Bolsheviks had the right idea but poor execution.  They take the Enlightenment to extremes and claim a direct logical progression from Voltaire to Trotsky.It makes me want to pull my hair out reading the drivel that these fools pass off as legitimate analysis.  If you question them as I do, be prepared for derision and challenges on every point.  I have given up trying to debate with them, as they are not interested in debate.I can see how Enlightenment thought provided some inspiration for the French Revolution, especially the notions of equality before the law, and the injustice of feudal privilege.  I think they, the revolutionaries, went overboard with their anti-religious feelings.  Many of the philosophes were deists and did not reject a divine being, they rejected the idea that he took an active part in human affairs.  Mostly they believed in Newton's Cosmic Watchmaker, if anything.

    April 18, 2009 at 8:08 pm #15253 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    One of my philosophy professors once told us the story about how Voltaire was asked what he thought about the Christ being resurrected from the dead, and he said he had no problem with it.  What? -was the response.  You, the great skeptic of religion, have no problem with this story?  Voltaire responded that his big problem was with the story of the Incarnation.I paraphrased the story but what it reveals is something really illuminating about his way of thinking.  For an all-powerful God, coming back to life from the dead is not a big deal at all.  Rather, for an omnipotent God to become a lowly man, that is the “big deal” that Voltaire couldn't accept.Anyway, sounds like you're debating socio-politics with your classmates as much as history.  I wonder what they think “good execution” would have looked like under the Bolsheviks….only half as many dead as the hundreds of thousands killed? 

    April 20, 2009 at 6:53 pm #15254 Reply
    scout1067
    Participant

    I would say I am debating socio-politics about 75% and history 25%.  I am one of the people in the darkness and need to be led to the light.I like the story about Voltaire.  It is one I have not heard before.  It is also very instructive of the way the philosophes thought.  They were not so much anti-religion as anti-church.  It is a subtle but critical difference and one that I think many people fail to distinguish.  It is possible to criticize the church and even its doctrine without being an atheist but many people do not.  It is almost as though they cannot see the forest for the trees.  This is also the distinction I think many of the radical republicans failed to make when they attacked belief during the revolution.

    January 24, 2021 at 12:34 am #58854 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    I have been debating with some other students who claim that secularization was simply a way for the Jacobins to solidify their power.  I say otherwise.

    I think that totalitarian control requires elimination of other influences which explain the world in competing ways, so religion is a natural target.  At the same time, it appears the Jacobins must have recognized that total control over a person’s identity requires control over that person’s traditions, so replacing religious institutions and practices would have been top on their list.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
Reply To: Anti-religion and the French Revolution
Your information:




Primary Sidebar

Login

Log In
Register Lost Password

Blog Categories

Search blog articles

Before Footer

  • Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?

    Julian the Apostate stands as an enigmatic figure among Roman emperors, ascending to power in 361 AD …

    Read More

    Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?
  • The Babylonian Bride

    Marriage customs in Ancient Babylon Ancient Babylonia was a society, which, although it did not …

    Read More

    The Babylonian Bride
  • The fall of Athens

    In 407 B.C. and again in 405 B.C.. the Spartans in alliance with their old enemies, the Persians, …

    Read More

    The fall of Athens

Footer

Posts by topic

2016 Election Alexander Hamilton American Revolution archaeology Aristotle Ben Franklin Black Americans Charles Dickens Christianity Christmas Constantine Custer's Last Stand Egypt email engineering England forum security Founding Fathers France future history George Washington Germany Greece hacker Hitler Industrial Revolution Ireland James Madison Jewish medieval military history Paleolithic philosophy pilgrimage Rome Russia SEO Slavery Socrates spammer technology Trump World War I World War II Year In Review

Recent Topics

  • Midsummer Night: June 25th
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?
  • Release of the JFK Files
  • What was the greatest military advancement of all time?

RSS Ancient News

Recent Forum Replies

  • Going to feature old posts
  • What’s new?
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Testing out a new feature

Copyright © 2025 · Contact

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.